[franfran]

Super Free All 4 Gangbangs 444444444 Gangbang But 5 Point Scale Who's the JAV actress in this video? Amateur? Name revealed!

Since it's college, I guess we should study once in a while... There's reports to write... And this girl is in the Faculty of Education, so I rated her using Amazon-style reviews, based on the nine compulsory subjects in Japanese education. Face ★★★★☆ Age ★★★★☆ Underwear ★★★★☆ Scent ★★★★☆ Breasts ★★★★☆ Nipples ★★★★☆ Thighs ★★★★☆ Pussy (Appearance) ★★★★☆ Pussy (Functionality) ★★★★☆ (((((Overall Score))))) ★★★★☆ So everything is a solid 4! Getting all 4s on a 10-point scale would be pretty weak, but on a 5-point scale, all 4s is actually excellent, right? In deviation score terms, that's about 60... In university terms, something like MARCH level... Average with nothing special is all 3s... The peak is all 5s... Complete garbage with zero value is all 1s... Of course, the best possible is all 5s! But honestly, those types don't exist... Plus, evaluations vary depending on the person judging... Isn't that just like Amazon reviews? Even for the same product, some people give ★★★★★ and praise it endlessly, while others give ★☆☆☆☆ and trash it completely... But there is such a thing as objective certainty... As someone who regularly interacts with girls through club activities, and who actually got to play with this girl on site, I've analyzed her as objectively as possible—hence the star ratings above. And remember, this is the verdict of someone who's an acclaimed top reviewer on Amazon—so you know it's accurate. Let me briefly break down each category again... Face ★★★★☆ She has well-proportioned facial features. She's got both cuteness and beauty—exactly the type of realistic, approachable girl that makes a guy think, "I want to fuck her." If she were insanely beautiful, you'd feel intimidated, right? And of course, ugly is out of the question—given the choice, you'd always pick cute. That's why this girl stands out. To put it in deviation score terms: dating an elite Tokyo University girl feels too high a hurdle, but a MARCH university girl? That's within reach. Age ★★★★☆ 20 years old. Second-year university student. She'd have gotten a full 5 if it were April, right after freshmen enrollment... But since she's already in her second year and has had her birthday, that's why it's minus one. There's definitely less appeal in 20 compared to 18—two fewer years of youthful excitement, so the score drops accordingly. Still, 20 is young enough—this 4 is completely justified. If she were under 18, the score would be 6 to 10. Only in cases so special they defy compliance rules can we ignore the 5-point scale. Underwear ★★★★☆ She's dressed safely and appropriately—nothing flashy, but solid. Scent ★★★★☆ Her body scent is actually quite pleasant. Breasts ★★★★☆ Around an E-cup... In both size and shape, these are definitely top-tier breasts. She's big-titted, sure, but not like "holy shit" big—so not quite in the extreme category. She barely qualifies as big tits, or if she does, she's at the lower end. Her nipple color is 4.5 to 5—almost a perfect 5. A 4 that's 4.9999999999999999999... out of 5. Butt ★★★★☆ Plump and soft—the good kind. Not like a fat person's softness. Thighs ★★★★☆ Plump and soft—the good kind. Not like a fat person's softness. Pussy (Appearance) ★★★★☆ Her pubic hair is well-groomed and neatly maintained. Pussy (Functionality) ★★★★☆ Impressive tightness. Lots of folds and ridges—very textured. So overall, another solid all-4 performance... Price: 400×400 = 1600 Runtime 23:02 (★★★★☆) mp4 (★★★★☆) 298MB (★★★★☆) ※※※※ Model is over 18 years old (★★★★☆) ※※※※ Redistribution, resale, and reuse strictly prohibited (★★★★☆) ※※※※ Compliant with all regulations and laws (★★★★☆)