It fell short. <p>Just as it says in the video review for Fuji Kanna, the interview is long for a documentary, and the camerawork on the POV sex is terrible. It felt like being shown a private video the director himself was enjoying, and it was dull. Buying it was a mistake... a waste of money...</p>
As POV sex, isn't this the best? <p>Personally, I honestly have no interest in an actress's background. People debut as a former celebrity, a former announcer, a former flight attendant and so on, but there's no way to know whether any of it is true. My judgment rests purely on the work itself. Everyone has their own tastes, of course.</p><br><p>This time Shiraishi appears. I didn't even know she came from SOD. I only learned of her around the time she debuted for Madonna and appeared in a popular series. I've bought several of her works, but honestly none of them made much of an impact on me. If I'm comparing, Fuji Kanna is my favorite.</p><br><p>What Shiraishi and Fuji have in common is that each devoted herself to something from childhood, came to know the limits of her own talent, and gave it up. And then made her AV debut. They walked different paths, but now they perform on the same stage.</p><br><p>Through director Yanai's interview at the start, Shiraishi's emotional walls gradually melt away. She speaks frankly about her achievements as a child, about her mother, and about how her feelings changed through marriage and childbirth up to the present. Director Yanai's skill as an interviewer is remarkable.</p><br><p>Once the sex begins, Shiraishi's face becomes that of a woman quite different from her usual work. I suspect it's the true face she shows only to someone she can trust. The two of them gaze at each other for a long time and kiss. That scene is beautiful too, even if Shiraishi's arm is in the way. After that it develops into sex. It isn't the usual run of positions, but I can hardly remember a work in which Shiraishi puts out her own tongue and asks for a kiss. It felt incredibly real. It happens in other works too, but when a woman asks for a kiss, isn't that when she has given both her heart and her body to the other person? Even if it is acting, this work pierced the viewer's heart. A male performer could never have made a work like this. For me it was perfect.</p>
The loving atmosphere is nice. <p>The interview certainly is long, but the sex had a really nice atmosphere. You could clearly tell how much Maririn loves sex lol.</p>
Private sex <p>If viewers come away with impressions such as "this doesn't look like acting" or "it's like private sex between a man and a woman in heat," then presumably the work was worth making.</p><p>The director gets quite a perk. I'd like a job like that too. I want to fuck this actress as well.</p><p>The actress's dreamy, melting eyes and the way she sticks out her tongue to beg for a kiss are irresistible.</p><p>I wanted a raw finish where semen dribbles out of her pussy, or where he re-inserts after ejaculating. Impossible in the current climate, I suppose!!</p>
POV sex works are difficult in all sorts of ways... <p>I like the concept of digging into the actress's personal side.</p><p>Even knowing the backbone behind the fantasy increases the immersion and the sense of transgression.</p><p>The POV sex section had such a strong feeling of private sex that it made me realize all over again that in her existing works she is, for better or worse, performing as an actress. It felt raw.</p><p>But that only applies to the actress; I wish the director (the male performer) had put more effort into making it something you can actually get off to as an AV work.</p><p>Even at the finish, the actress hands him an erotic opening by asking "where do you want to come?", and yet he simply ejaculates carelessly onto her lower abdomen with no regard for how it looks.</p><p>That makes it nothing more than self-indulgent perk sex.</p><p>Precisely because the actress's performance and the concept of the work are both excellent, it felt all the more like a wasted opportunity.</p>